The mysterious Kofu UFO case. REAL Scientific evidence of the existence of UFO ! Re-Analysis of M-Report
Undoubted evidence of astonishment!
Provided by Space Phenomena Observatory Center (SPOC)(*1), August 9, 2020
Introduction
The following report is a startling report analyzed and analyzed by senior researcher T. Kira of JSPS (Japan Space Phenomena Society), an internationally recognized Japanese scientific UFO research organization. In the history of UFOs, perhaps the world's first and unquestionably astonishing proof of UFO reality was discovered.
This incident is said to have occurred a CE3 (*2) in the vineyards of Kofu City, Yamanashi Prefecture,JAPAN on the evening of Sunday, February 23, 1975.
Two 7-year-olds first witness a UFO. After that, they found a UFO that landed in a vineyard.
When they approaching the object, a humanoid that suddenly appeared and touched their shoulder from behind. The children were frightened and fled home.
The UFO itself has multiple witnesses, and their parents also witness the mysterious light bodies disappearing in the air in the direction of the children. Also, it was a shocking incident that it was discovered that the pillars of the vineyard in the vineyard that were supposed to have landed were broken at a later date.
(*2 Dr. J. Allen Hynek is a well-known U.S. astronomer and UFO researcher. He has many years of experience as an advisor to the U.S. Air Force UFO research institute, "Project Blue Book." Encounters with UFO and aliens were defined in three stages.
Close Encounters of the 1st Kind: Witness the UFO from a close range of 500 feet or less.
Close Encounters of the 2nd Kind: When the UFO leaves some kind of influence or trace around.
Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind: Contact with UFO crew. )
In fact, this is not the end of the story. No one thought back then that it would be a startling event in history. Except for one teacher.
By the way, in this year, Margaret Thatcher, the first female leader of the British Conservative Party, was elected. The Vietnam War ended. The Soviet and American spaceships succeeded in docking for the first time in history.
In the previous year, the Izu Peninsula offshore big earthquake. Tokyo Mona Lisa exhibition were held. India's first underground nuclear test. The resignation of US President Nixon in the Watergate case. The Mitsubishi heavy industry bombing case. The nuclear ship Mutsu radiation leak accident. There was a message sent to aliens from the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.
Special, the purpose and motivation for aliens to land in this Kofu city is a mystery, but it just happened.
However, it is also true that the Kofu case has been questioned by various parties for a long time.
It's no exaggeration to say that all this was dispelled by the fact that this report found "certain evidence that should never be there at that time".
Now, please see T. Kira's astonishing analysis report in its original form.
Scientific evidence of the existence of UFO !
Re-Analysis of M-Report
(Subtitle: Report of residual radioactivity at UFO 3rd CE site)
August 2020 Japan Space Phenomena Society Senior Researcher T.Kira
1. Overview
1975, M-Report was created. M-Report was a report that records the radioactivity at the third close encounter (3rd CE) site. Radioactivity was only exceeds above that measured naturally in everyday life. However, this radioactivity disappeared with a half-life of about 15 days. This was a radioactivity that could not exist in nature!
This time, I tried to reanalyze the M-Report created 45 years ago. As a result, two facts were concluded from the scientific figures. What does this conclusion mean?
(1) There was a radioisotope ( 32P : phosphorus 32）at the 3rd CE site .
(2) A nuclear reactor appeared at the 3rd CE site.
2. M-Report making process
The 3rd CE occurred in Koufu City, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan on the evening of Sunday, February 23, 1975.
Two 7-year-old children encountered an UFO that landed in a vineyard and two humanoids who emerged from it. The children were surprised and ran home. At that time, the parents also witnessed any vanishing light in the pointing direction of the children.
This incredible story is called the Koufu Incident from the place name. However, this story alone seemed to be just fake news.
The next day, the elementary school where the children attended became a fuss over this story. And it became a local newspaper article. A local high school teacher, Mr. M, caught my eyes in this newspaper article. Mr. M had a national qualification as the chief of the first class radioactivity handling. Then, the soil at the 3rd CE site was sampled from the point and the radioactivity was measured with a Geiger Counter.
As a result, radioactivity with a half-life of 10 to 20 days was detected from the site. Mr. M was surprised, because he understand that such short half-life radioactivity cannot exist in nature. M-Report was created by Mr. M at 45 years ago.
3. M-Report Summary
Mr. M collected a total of 35 samples such as soil from the 3rd CE site 4 times 3/2, 3/6, 3/8, 3/11. Radioactivity was slightly detected in the two samples. (Sample 7 and Sample 23)
Therefore, the measurement was continued for another month.
The strength of the radioactivity was about 1.3 times that of the radioactivity existing in nature (hereinafter background). This strength is comparable to the difference in natural radioactivity between East Japan and West Japan. There is no problem at all. However, when I continued the measurement for about a month, Mr. M was startled !
Radioactivity gradually decreased !
The half-life of the two samples was about 11 days and about 18 days. Mr. M clearly understood that such short-lived radioactivity does not exist in nature.
Because the radioactivity that halves in about 10 days was twice stronger befor 10 days ago. And one month ago (10 days repeated 3 times) it was 8 times stronger. And about a year ago (10 days repeated 36 times), it must be 68.7 billion times more stronger! Despite the fact that the radioactivity at the time of detection is as weak as that in the natural world, if the radioactivity is 68.7 billion times that, it will adversely affect the human body. Such radioactivity cannot exist in the vineyards !
The measured radioactivity that about 10 days half-life, mean that something ridiculous happened in the vineyard.
Mr. M was no longer able to wait for this measurement result. In order to identify the source of radioactivity, we relied on it and performed a remeasurement using a gamma-ray(γ-ray) spectrum meter at a nuclear research institute on April 5 and May 31.
As a result, radioactivity with a short half-life was also detected. In addition, the gamma-ray spectrum showed that the soil was exposed to heavy ion beams, a type of radiation.
However, the radioactivity was completely attenuated by 5/31 when it was measured for the second time at a certain research institute. Radioactivity was hardly detected even with a highly sensitive spectrum meter. Therefore, it was not possible to specify the radiation source. Mr. M left the survey results, along with detailed measurement figures, in the M-Report as much as possible. (See Photo-1)
Photo-1
M-report cover February 23, 1975 Outline
of investigation research on Kofu-city UFO case
4. M-Report Re-Analysis
The M-Report recorded the measurement numbers at that time using the Geiger counter. Not only the radioactivity value (X value) measured for the sample, but also the value measured without applying the sample(Y value: background value) and the measurement date were also recorded.
For this reason, it is still now possible to Re-Analyze the radioactivity values left in the M-Report. (See Photo-2 & List-1)
Photo-2
The important list (4th page of M-Report)
Table-1 What was written clearly from Photograph-2 (Yellow column is the correction part of calculation error in M report)
In the M-Report, the intensity of radioactivity of the sample was treated as the difference from the background (X-Y). The half-life was also analyzed for the two samples separately, about 11 days and about 18 days. However, the analysis at that time was a manual calculation, and it was up to here.
Currently, if the half-life of radioactivity is known, the radiation source can be identified. The net is full of information. The important thing is to know the exact half-life !
I combined the measurement results of two samples and analyzed them as one sample. I didn't think there were multiple sources of radioactivity. Radioactivity intensity was also analyzed by the ratio (X/Y).
The results are shown in Fig-1. It seems that the radioactivity changed in the M-Report for about one month. The horizontal axis shows the date and time, and the vertical axis shows the intensity of radioactivity.
Surprisingly, the data of the two samples are beautifully mixed. It was never wrong to analyze the two samples together.
Figure 1 Changes in radioactivity over the course of days (M-report) The Graph of Table-1
There are more important things. The graph clearly draws a downward sloping curve. There are some ups and downs in individual data. However, looking at all the 15 data, it becomes clear as the days go by. It decays smoothly.
I used the least squares method. Then, I entered the M-Report figures into the table software of a personal computer and calculated for the half-life that minimized the error.
・・・・Automatic calculations were performed millions of times・・・.
As a result, the combined radioactivity of the two samples has a half-life of 15 ± 1 day. The intensity was calculated to be 1.33 times the natural background as of February 23, 1975.
What does this reanalysis result mean?
5. Meaning of half-life of 15 days
On the internet, 4425 kinds of radioactive isotopes were found. Of these, only 6 types of radioactive elements have a half-life of 15 ± 1 day! 5 of them were isotopes that are not familiar to us, such as radium 225, europium 156, bismuth 205, osmium 191, and vanadium 48.
However, the only well-known element was the radioisotope phosphorus 32. This half-life was 14.26 days. Natural phosphorus is 100% non-radioactive phosphorus 31(*1). However, the phosphorus isotope Phosphorus 32(*2) emits β ray of a kind of radiation with a half-life of 14.26 days.
The radioisotope phosphorus 32 did not just meet the required half-life. The β rays emitted by phosphorus 32 are particularly easy to be caught by the Geiger counter used by Mr. M. Moreover, phosphorus 32 emits particularly strong β rays. (Note: The number of radiations is small, but each radiation is extremely strong. In other words, The radiation was very small quantity, but was very high quality.) It is explain why the Geiger counter was able to catch the radio for a long time even though the radioactivity was extremely little quantity. Other radioactive isotopes emit radiation of a type that is difficult to catch with a Geiger counter.
*1: Phosphorus 31 (Nucleus consisting of 15 protons and 16 neutrons: no radioactivity)
*2: Phosphorus 32 (Nucleus consisting of 15 protons and 17 neutrons: radioactivity)
The radioactive source recorded in the M-Report and left at the third type approaching encounter site is definitely Phosphorus 32! So why did Phosphorus 32 exist in vineyards?
Normal phosphorus is phosphorus 31 which is 100% no-radioactive!
Further investigation, phosphorus is an essential element for life phenomena. Radioactive Phosphorus-32 has been artificially made for research purposes from a while ago. There were several ways to make it. One of them was to put ordinary phosphorus 31 into a nuclear reactor and expose it to neutron rays to convert it into phosphorus 32. Other methods were similar.
Analysis up to this point will create a one story!
The 3rd CE site is a Vineyard ! Naturally, a lot of phosphorus of fertilizer is sprinkled. What if a reactor appeared here? All doubts can be explained very well.
Of course, it is impossible for a nuclear reactor to appear in a vineyard.
Next are my conclusions.
6. Conclusion
(1) Facts (facts with Scientific figures backing.)
1) March 1975, there was a radioactive element(Phosphorus 32) in the vineyard.
2) A nuclear reactor appeared in the vineyard. What's more, this has happened very closely
since March 1975 !
(2) Strong estimation (including children's 3rd CE testimony)
1) The UFO appeared in the vineyard on the evening of Sunday, February 23, 1975.
7. Sequel
There are two unbelievable stories.
(1) A radioisotope with a half-life of 14.26 days was detected in the vineyard.
(2) About one week ago, there was a report of an incident the 3rd CE in the vineyard.
When two unbelievable stories come together, sometimes one unbelievable story is born.
In March 1975, phosphorus 32 existed in the vineyard. This is a scientific fact, according to the figures in the M-report. Not an estimate ! According, It is also true that a nuclear reactor appeared in the vineyard.
One week before the radioactivity was detected, an incident with a the UFO 3rd CE was reported. I can't think of anything unrelated to this scientific fact !
The reactor that appeared in the vineyard could be strongly estimated to be a Real UFO !
The M-Report was created 45 years ago in 1975. And figures and radioactivity do not lie!
"UFO exist !"
I can't think of any other explanation. If there is any other way to explain the numbers in the M-Report other than the conclusions here, please let me know!
All important figures are posted here. I hope that Please many people would like to Re-Analyze the M-Report.
Let me addtional. The theory that phosphorus 32 was artificially abandoned in the vineyard does not hold. Because phosphorus 32 emits only β rays. Even if someone throws away the phosphorus 32, the β ray emitted by the phosphorus 32 does not have the power to activate the soil around it. This is completely inconsistent with the γray spectrum meter measurement result at a certain laboratory.
Appendix
Figure-A1 Location of Kofu City, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan (Reference GoogleMAP)
Figure-A2 Site (vineyard) Surrounded by a white rope (temporarily placed by a JSPS member later), The position of the bag is the center of the UFO at the landing site (©JSPS Osaka Branch Manager, Mr. Kazuo Hayashi Libray)
Figure-A3 Combining UFO drawn by two children of the parties separately into one sheet
Signed by them (©JSPS Osaka Branch Manager, Mr. Kazuo Hayashi Libray)
Figure-A3 Combining humanoids drawn by two children of the parties separately into one sheet
Signed by them (©JSPS Osaka Branch Manager, Mr. Kazuo Hayashi Libray)
***The copyright of the contents of this manuscript belongs to Mr. T. Kira, and the introductory contents belongs to the Space Phenomena Observatory Center(SPOC). Also, in the case of reprinting or copying, any processing, editing or addition is prohibited.***
(*1) Space Phenomena Observatory Center(SPOC) SID-1
Blog https://spacephenomena.blog.fc2.com/ and Youtube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTqD750RqvlJ1Q0uYlDxSMQ/
